Wednesday 30 May 2012

Magic Mushrooms?

Maia Szalavitz of Time Magazine reports

The psychedelic drug in magic mushrooms may have lasting medical and spiritual benefits, according to new research from Johns Hopkins School of Medicine.

The mushroom-derived hallucinogen, called psilocybin, is known to trigger transformative spiritual states, but at high doses it can also result in "bad trips" marked by terror and panic. The trick is to get the dose just right, which the Johns Hopkins researchers report having accomplished.

In their study, the Hopkins scientists were able to reliably induce transcendental experiences in volunteers, which offered long-lasting psychological growth and helped people find peace in their lives — without the negative effects.

"The important point here is that we found the sweet spot where we can optimize the positive persistent effects and avoid some of the fear and anxiety that can occur and can be quite disruptive," says lead author Roland Griffiths, professor of behavioral biology at Hopkins.

Giffiths' study involved 18 healthy adults, average age 46, who participated in five eight-hour drug sessions with either psilocybin — at varying doses — or placebo. Nearly all the volunteers were college graduates and 78% participated regularly in religious activities; all were interested in spiritual experience.

Fourteen months after participating in the study, 94% of those who received the drug said the experiment was one of the top five most meaningful experiences of their lives; 39% said it was the single most meaningful experience.

Critically, however, the participants themselves were not the only ones who saw the benefit from the insights they gained: their friends, family member and colleagues also reported that the psilocybin experience had made the participants calmer, happier and kinder.

Ultimately, Griffiths and his colleagues want to see if the same kind of psychedelic experience could help ease anxiety and fear over the long term in cancer patients or others facing death. And following up on tantalizing clues from early research on hallucinogenic drugs like LSD, mescaline and psilocybin in the 1960s (which are all now illegal), researchers are also studying whether transcendental experiences could help spur recovery from addiction and treat other psychological problems like depression and post-traumatic stress disorder.

For Griffiths' current experiment, participants were housed in a living room-like setting designed to be calm, comfortable and attractive. While under the influence, they listened to classical music on headphones, wore eyeshades and were instructed to "direct their attention inward."

Each participant was accompanied by two other research-team members: a "monitor" and an "assistant monitor," who both had previous experience with people on psychedelic drugs and were empathetic and supportive. Before the drug sessions, the volunteers became acquainted enough with their team so that they felt familiar and safe. Although the experiments took place in the Hopkins hospital complex in order to ensure prompt medical attention in the event that it was needed, it never was.

As described by early advocates of the use of psychedelics — from ancient shamans to Timothy Leary and the Grateful Dead — the psilocybin experience typically involves a sense of oneness with the universe and with others, a feeling of transcending time, space and other limitations, coupled with a sense of holiness and sacredness. Overwhelmingly, these experiences are difficult to put into words, but many of Griffiths' participants said they were left with the sense that they understood themselves and others better and therefore had greater compassion and patience.

Reference:http://healthland.time.com/2011/06/16/magic-mushrooms-can-improve-psychological-health-long-term/

"The Casual Vacancy" -JK Rowling's next book

It may lack wizards and witches, but J.K. Rowling and her publisher are hoping her first novel for adults, "The Casual Vacancy," will have the magic touch.

The book's title was announced Thursday by Little, Brown & Co. along with a brief plot synopsis and publication date.

The publisher said the "blackly comic" tale of rivalry and duplicity in a small English town would be available worldwide on Sept. 27.

The book will be Rowling's first post-Potter effort. Her seven-volume saga about the adventures of a boy wizard became one of the most successful fictional series in history and led to a series of extremely popular films.

The new book, aimed at a grown-up audience, will be set in a seemingly idyllic English town called Pagford which is described as far more menacing than its pretty facade would indicate.
It opens with the sudden death of a popular man whose unexpected demise shocks the town. The battle for his seat on the local council sets off "the biggest war the town has yet seen," with rich people fighting poor, parents battling their teenagers, and wives in conflict with their husbands.

The publisher said the 480-page novel will be sold as an e-book and audio download as well as in traditional hardback form.

Reference: Associated Press(AP)

Korean Wave? Huh? What!

"I would rather help my fellow Filipino artist by buying and listening to their songs. Kpop can't help you cause' most Koreans don't listen foreign music especially Filipino, because they believed they are the best. how about Filipino? do you believed that you are the best?" -Unknown


Sick of K-pop cult
by: Adeline Chia
In David Mitchell's 2004 novel Cloud Atlas, there is a futuristic segment set in Korea where a corpocracy rules the land. Advances in bioengineering have allowed human creatures called fabricants to be bred as workers. Physically, they are perfect specimens - with identical, beautiful faces but without any higher consciousness. When they run out the course of their productive lives, they are destroyed.

I found this section of the book particularly disturbing. It is a chilling study of how a capitalist totalitarian society exploits the weak and turns humans into robots for money. Everything looks happy on the surface but beneath, it's maggots and rotten meat.

Recently, I got a taste of Mitchell's dystopian view - at a K-pop fan meet of superband TVXQ.
What's a fan meet? It is a shrunken version of a concert, with only a handful of live performances. Interspersed with the song-and-dance numbers are screenings of music videos and sanitised Q&A sessions.

To any disinterested observer, it was a blatant rip-off. To the fans, it was like communing with the gods. It was a uniquely depressing experience but during the show, I could not put my finger on the reason.

Could it have been the dead-eyed way the pop princes answered questions from stuttering fans about their favourite Singaporean food? Or the well-choreographed dance moves they executed, without a glitch, to songs scientifically engineered to stick onto your brain like a leech?

Then, it dawned on me. They are fabricants. Singing, dancing fabricants.
But I am being unfair on TVXQ. They are not the only K-pop group to have infiltrated the consciousness and fantasies of teenagers in Asia and beyond.
A lot has been made about the Hallyu Wave, the unstoppable South Korean pop culture tsunami that has washed up on the shores of the world, conquering music charts, television ratings and the wall space of adolescents' rooms.

I am heartily sick of it. Every bit of it. The manufactured sounds, the ersatz emotions, the clone-like stars, the cult- like, weepy fandom.

My more moderate friends point out that teen idols from the East and the West were never the vanguard of musical experimentation. Neither did they inspire devotion from level-headed people.

Before your Super Juniors or 2AMs, there were cheesy boybands such as Backstreet Boys in the noughties and The Partridge Family from the 1970s.

But of all the decades of cashing in on teenagers' hormonal urges, the K-pop phenomenon seems the most coldly cynical and formulaic. Compared to the uniformity of the Korean stars, Backstreet Boys seem like veritable bastions of individuality.

Part of the reason is because the Korean record labels have gotten their star-making formula down to a T.
This seems to be the drill: Train some nice-looking kids in a star factory. Assemble a group of them. Give them a name that is an abbreviation for something or just a random collection of letters and numbers.
The girls must have stick-thin arms and legs and the boys must look a bit like girls. Next, produce a song that is the demon child of Lady Gaga and Black Eyed Peas. Throw in Autotune, hip-hop beats and strong synth lines. Make a video that is a mini movie, featuring the stars doing synchronised dance moves while the back-up dancers gurn at the sides.

Voila! You have a viral hit.

For the record, I have nothing against pre-packaged happy, shiny music. In fact, I think there is something heroic and wonderful about the wilfully plasticky and fake.

But my quarrel with K-pop is not only with the aesthetic aridity of its products but with how nasty it can get. For one thing, the Mafia-like way the record companies exploit their stars and audience is chilling.
The industry has long been stalked by controversy around "slave" contracts that tie trainee stars to long exclusive deals with poor pay and little control.

Incidentally, three of TVXQ's five members took their record label to court because their 13-year contract was too long, restrictive and gave them little profit. The boys won and left to form their own group, JYJ.
Admittedly, it is hard to feel sorry for pop stars ("It's sad to hear that being adored by millions prevents you from taking public transport"), but in my rare maternal moments, I worry about these starlets who are worked to the bone and whose careers last as long as their good looks. Then they are discarded like rag dolls.
Then there is K-pop's effects on listeners. It turns functional people into crazed addicts, acting in robotic idolatry.
Recently, watching a sea of red lightsticks keeping beat to a song made me and my companion grab on to each other. Eyes wide in terror, we communicated wordlessly for fear of persecution. Our faces said this: "Are we at a cult gathering?"

K-pop is also unique in inspiring extreme behaviour from fans and generating psychosis. Cyber-bullying and online smear campaigns are common practices by anti-fans who target a certain entertainer they hate.
Sometimes, anti-fans turn into stalkers or criminals. Yun Ho from TVXQ famously had an anti-fan spike his drink with super glue and had to have his stomach pumped.

Those are just the haters. There are those who profess love by cutting themselves and writing letters in blood, before sending their bloody epistolary packages to their idols.

Admittedly, these are the extreme cases. But I also wonder if anti-fan behaviour is encouraged by the record labels to generate more publicity for their artists.

Who knows? Still, it is undeniable that K-pop exerts a hypnotic pull. It is unstoppable. It is a virus that spreads like fire over the radio, on television and in ringtones.

I know this because I had to do research for this article and listen to a lot of fabricants perform their music. Before I know it, the melodies have wormed their way into the folds of my grey matter, made my synapses misfire, caused me to lose control of my wrist on my computer mouse - till I am clicking on the same video in YouTube again and again, staring glassy-eyed at my screen, alone, at four in the morning.

"Resist!" the sentient part of my brain cried softly. To which Super Junior cheerily replied: "Sorry, sorry, sorry, sorry..."

*********
[Filipino-English Language Alert]

Is it really more fun in the Philippines? by this things? I don't know what to say but I Have to admit K-Pop is somewhat killing our own culture!






Friday 18 May 2012

The Adventures of Tintin (2011)

Based on The Adventures of Tintin by Hergé
The Adventures of Tintin comes at you in a whoosh, like a volcano full of creative ideas in full eruption... It hits home for the kid in all of us who wants to bust out and run free.

This film is superlative! It's like solving a puzzle!

The Secret World of Arietty (2010)

The Borrower Arrietty/The Secret World of Arietty is a 2010 Japanese animated fantasy film directed by Hiromasa Yonebayashi but loosely based on a series of novel written by Mary Norton [a British author] entitled as "The Borrowers".

Heart-achingly tender and sweet. A very thoughtful art direction includes clever and charming details that made me smile throughout. It brings something much more valuable, really: genuine aesthetic bliss.

Hugo (2011)

Hugo is a film based on Brian Selznick's novel "The Invention of Hugo Cabret"

It is very educational for the movie lovers who lack the knowledge of its history.

Hugo is a master filmmaker's gift to children. It teaches, in an age-appropriate way, why films/movies are very important and why it's essential that we take care of them. It's a passionate brief for film preservation wrapped in a fanciful tale of childhood intrigue and adventure, Hugo dazzlingly conjoins the earliest days of cinema with the very latest big screen technology. To memory watching Hugo ranks with the best movie watching experiences of my life. So rare is the film that reminds one of why they fell in love with the movies in the first place.No wonder it was nominated in 11 categories at the 84th Academy Awards.

It reminds me of our old Filipino movies that are not being recognize nowadays just like what Howwie Severino documented on i-Witness of GMA-7.

Thursday 17 May 2012

Diary of A Wimpy Kid: Rodrick Rules (2011) Movie Review


Title: Diary of A Wimpy Kid: Rodrick Rules (2011)           
Type: Book Adaptation by Jeff Kinney                           
Genre: Realistic Fiction, Comedy                                
Elapsed Time: 1 hour and 35 minutes                          
Cast:Zachary Gordon, Devon Bostick, and Robert Capron 
Rating: 4.5/5.0 Excellent!
Review:
Youngster or should I say a kid’s movies come and go, and some (shamelessly) rely on big 3D promises to get the younger audience into cinema seats. So, it’s nice to see a good old-fashioned kids film – minus 3D – with bundles of straightforward, playful fun that all generations can enjoy. Sequels are tricky nuts to crack, especially with so much expectation involved, but with an army of young fans in tow, things should prove easier. This is definitely the case with Part 2 of the Wimpy Kid called Rodrick Rules that’s a mix of various moments in the book series, and feels more heartfelt, funnier, and a little less gross than the first film last year.
The bestselling book and the blockbuster film follows Greg Heffley (Zachary Gordon), a kid who’s ‘wimpy’ cool, and his misfit band of friends. In this film, Greg’s a year older and begins seventh grade at middle school. He and his rocker-wannabe older brother – and chief tormentor – Rodrick (Devon Bostick) must deal with their parents’ (played byRachael Harris and Steve Zahn) misguided attempts to get them to bond. In the meantime, Greg starts having feelings for girls – well, one in particular called Holly (the dolly-like Peyton List), and must deal with growing up while fending off his brothers’ attempts to ruin his life.

Constitute like a typical comedy TV show like the one that is aired during primetime in TV 5, minus the canned laughter, Wimpy Kid 2 does well to paint a brief picture of who all the characters are, and doesn’t just annoyingly presume that you know the background story, hence leaving out the newcomer. For those fond of the book’s cartoon style, the film-makers still blend animation and live-action to satisfy all tastes. The story may well be for kids but it still targets adult nostalgia for school-day issues, fear of social exclusion, and first crushes in a quirky, snappy and witty fashion.
Observing and watching Greg grow up feels like watching a little brother of your own, and the characters are some of the most fleshed out and appealing of many family films of late. Gordon has developed Greg further, making him a little wiser and adding more depth in this film, as well as upped his comic timing for such a young actor. In fact, he and Robert Capron as his crazy, loyal friend, Rowley, make quite an accomplished comedic pairing in this, where Rowley is a strong right-hand gag man – much like tame, child-friendly Superbad, where the friendship strengthens as time goes on.
Bostick recompensing as annul teen Rodrick, and shares a lot more screen-time with Greg – as the title suggests. Both actors convincingly portray that fine balance between brotherly love-hate with great humour, sentimentality and unspoken understanding. It’s a bond that anyone with siblings can relate to, and it’s a tonic to watch the maturing transformation of both brothers, without them losing all their innocence. And it’s childhood innocence that this series emphasises and embraces that makes it so memorable and enjoyable.
Both Harris and Zahn are the chalk-and-cheese guardians/parents and excellent as the elder Heffleys, delightfully recreating all the childhood embarrassments you can possibly imagine – especially when trying to impress the opposite sex (cue Mom dance). As with the younger members of the cast, Harris and Zahn have perfect comedy timing and rapport that keeps things authentic and sparky, making the family unit a complete one worth spending 101 minutes in the company with. This is ironic considering its ‘warring factions’.
The infantile aspect would not be complete without touches of smut (Rodrick’s Löded Diper band) and bodily-function jokes (Greg’s ‘holy’ embarrassment), but none of it’s done to excess at the expense of the storyline, with the visual gags never dwelled on but nicely edited to enhance what a character is going through at any one moment. There’s a mixture of quick-fire gags and longer-running verbal quips (the Mom Buck exchange for spending time together) that keep the pace interesting and non-complacent, too.
We raffle a Mom Buck you’ll have a good and nice time in the company of the Heffleys, a family like any other dealing with highs and lows, tears and tantrums that will have you rolling your eyes and nodding in recognition. Being able to relate is central to the series’ success, and with the help of a cracking sense of humour and credible family flaws, Jeff Kinney‘s illustrated novel Diary of a Wimpy Kid 2 has been carefully adapted and cannot help but resonate with anyone, regardless of being a fan or not.

Are we all internet addicts now?

The debate about the risks posed by internet addiction has begun again with the publication of an editorial in the American Journal of Psychiatry on the topic.

Let's take a look at what Jerald Block said. He identifies three "subtypes" of internet addiction: excessive gaming, sexual preoccupations, and e-mail/text messaging (not strictly internet, I know).

Want to know if you're addicted? He provides these four criteria:

1. Excessive use, often associated with a loss of sense of time or a neglect of basic drives
2. Withdrawal, including feelings of anger, tension, and/or depression when the computer is inaccessible
3. Tolerance, including the need for better computer equipment, more software, or more hours of use
4. Negative repercussions, including arguments, lying, poor achievement, social isolation, and fatigue

Ignoring the sex and gaming addicts, aren't rather a lot of people email/text messaging addicts according to this scheme?

Modern life revolves around the two - and increasing around online social networking as well. We use at all times of the day (excessive use), get stressed when a low battery stops us messaging (withdrawal), constantly buy new devices (tolerance) and would probably get more done if we showed more restraint (negative repercussions).

Those communication methods are becoming ever more central to everyday life - part of nearly every social, commercial and business transaction. Is society driving us all into addiction, or have the doctors got ahead of themselves and medicalised social and technological trends?

I'm no psychologist. But I do not think there is anything inherently dangerous or addictive about internet technologies and applications. The reported increases in addiction are still preliminary results, and likely mostly an effect of growing medical attention to the "problem".

Some people certainly will suffer genuine problems with addiction to online activities. But surely those that do are susceptible to such problems, even in the web's absence? I struggle to believe that the web could shove lots of otherwise healthy people over that particular edge.

If I become the President of the Philippines -"I will be the Government Officials WORST NIGHTMARE"

Jaidienomics" will become my economic policy term. Our nation can achieve greatness, but it depends on the efforts of all our citizen...